throwmoreswords: (Default)
gilgamesh ([personal profile] throwmoreswords) wrote2019-02-20 10:22 pm

[ic inbox] - Kaisou

You'd ought have a good reason for calling upon me directly, Mongrel.
State your case and don't bore me--or there may be consequences.

username:
AUO
📷
fionnuisce: (Default)

[personal profile] fionnuisce 2024-08-30 01:42 pm (UTC)(link)
[To his credit, Waver's reaction was just to roll his eyes as he took a bite of his own slice.]

Is there a reason it shouldn't? Most anyone with sense would be on edge around a door to endless power.
fionnuisce: (may we stay lost on our way home)

[personal profile] fionnuisce 2024-08-30 01:52 pm (UTC)(link)
With all respect, none of them have ever seen you as an enemy. I'm very well aware my unease is irrational; if I didn't realize that, I wouldn't even be here.

[this emotional support cat could not be happier]

Separating the person in front of me now from the Archer and even Caster I know is not an easy task, but I have been trying to at least manage a good faith effort. If you find fault in that, there isn't a lot more I can do right away.
Edited (stupid phone ) 2024-08-30 13:52 (UTC)
fionnuisce: (carrying onward)

[personal profile] fionnuisce 2024-08-30 02:45 pm (UTC)(link)
[god why are you a disney princess and magnet for weird shit.]

Like I said--it's irrational. I know it is. It's plain as day right now that you're someone else, and I want to understand that more clearly rather than be a hypocritical fool about the matter. If there's something you want to explain in clear terms, then you have an attentive audience.
fionnuisce: (save you from your old ways)

[personal profile] fionnuisce 2024-08-30 06:17 pm (UTC)(link)
...

[True to his word, he did listen with complete attention; his hand moved in some attempt to pet the ghost cat, though his eyes remained focused on Gilgamesh. Calculating, if in a much different way. What was a ledger for Gilgamesh was a chess board for Waver--evaluating a thousand different possibilities, measuring potential courses of action and what might unfold once they were followed.]

I'm relieved we're on the same page in that regard, in both cases. I can't claim to know Caster well enough, but your summation of Archer is something I couldn't possibly have said better myself.

[Then he paused to consider something, slowly taking a drink of the wine in front of him. Gilgamesh probably wasn't going to poison him, least of all after all that.]

I wonder, if you don't mind my asking...how do you reconcile that; knowing the person you were in another timeline was wildly different to the person you are here and now?
fionnuisce: (i'll gather these fallen flowers)

[personal profile] fionnuisce 2024-08-30 07:27 pm (UTC)(link)
[paracelsus has been Booped. what a terrible insult, an injustice, a--nah just kidding he's purring up a storm and doing a tap right back.]

...I think all of that makes a lot of sense, actually. [The person he was, versus the person he could be. Few people focused so sharply on latent potential as Waver, and he saw the shape of the matter clearly through that particular lens.]

There's only so much of this I can truly understand, since I lack memories like that. But the wider concept is something I've considered myself; that a person is 'themselves' regardless of what they might be in other timelines. Things like what one might be fated to be are useless, and nature versus nurture seems a stupid debate to have as well.

So I guess...now that I have a better perspective, maybe what I wanted to do was apologize.